A Tale of Two Amphitheaters

1 banner

Well since you’ve come this far you can see where I got the name and tagline for this blog site in the Assembly Herald banner above. Four cents was the price for all the news that fit in the eight pages they print. The cost of a season gate pass was $5.00 and a week at the Athenaeum (American plan from the beginning) ranged from $15-$25.00 if your keeping score at home. I have clipped article quotes from the 1892-93′ editions of the Chautauqua Assembly Herald about Chautauqua’s bold decisions to build a New Amp, Sewer system, and other major improvements. They further describe the incredible and accelerating evolution occurring in Chautauqua at the time. I have pulled out the most appropriate quotes in italics and center blocked them above each article clipping for those who don’t want to read the whole thing. I thank you for your support…of our sponsors, in advance.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness…it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness…in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”

A TALE OF TWO CITIES by Charles Dickens

Meanwhile, back in Versailles, the monarchy and the royal court were accused of being isolated from, and indifferent to the escalating crisis. The Enlightenment had produced many writers, pamphleteers and publishers who could inform or inflame public opinion depending on their choice of words. The opposition used this resource to mobilize public opinion against the French monarchy.

The hindsight of looking back in history and making comparisons sometimes allows for greater context, better perception, and a more thorough understanding of current events. While some of the language swirling around the Amp uprising may somewhat resemble the French Revolution, the situation isn’t as dire. But there is little doubt that, like the weather, things are starting to heat up. Unfortunately the various aspirations and resentments of of a wide variety of constituents has cast this whole New Amp project into a negative character debate. So I guess that makes the Gadfly, the Voices, the committee, and yours truly, the Four Pamphleteers (amongst others). So this Pamphleteer is throwing it back to 103 years after the aforementioned revolution and further exploring “for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison,” Chautauqua then and now.

Chautauqua finds itself in a similar situation today, as it was between the 1892 & 1893 Seasons. The Amphitheatre, despite just being 14 seasons old is already showing signs of age and it’s clear that it can’t keep pace with the growth of Roger’s Band, other performances, and the growing Assembly in general. The flat roof is leaking and causes a deafening noise during rain storms, and there is ongoing concern about the winter snow loads. The numerous columns cause many seats to have obstructed views while the oil lamps are a fire hazard. There had been talk of renovating the Amphitheatre after the 1891 season, but the cost was as great as that of building a new Amphitheatre. The board tabled that decision until the summer of 1892 as they wanted to ensure that previously incurred debt (primarily the building of the Athenaeum) was paid off first. In anticipation of that, during the summer of 1892 the Board had shown tremendous fortitude and foresight by approving over $100,000 in new construction projects slated to be completed before the 1893 Assembly begins. With Chautauqua on firm financial footing the rebuilding of the Amphitheatre and the installation of a new Sewer system topped an extensive and incredibly ambitious list.

 amp 1893 rogers bandRogers Band on the Platform and in the Choir Gallery of the New Amp

I did the home work, reading every issue of the Assembly Herald from 1892-93′ and surprisingly enough there was no mention of a “Save the Amp” campaign. I guess “sanguinary enthusiastic” Chautauquans (if there were any) at the time, realized that the old Amp had indeed outlived it’s day and Chautauqua needed and deserved a new one. Ada Louise Huxtable, Pulitzer Prize winning architecture critic for the NY Times wrote in her October 30, 1963 editorial,  “Farewell to Penn Station”, “Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves.” She of course was lamenting the loss of Penn Station but that literary sword cuts both ways and across time. Chautauqua, by virtue of an unprecedented fundraising effort and corresponding outpouring of philanthropic support by generations of Chautauquans has raised $30 Million to pay for the New Amp, which is much needed, richly deserved, and those efforts should be greatly admired.

The next three articles are from the 1892 Assembly Herald and detail the decisions by the Board of Trustees to proceed with the planned improvements between the 1892 & 1893 seasons. Private investment in more new cottages being built than ever before also signals a growing confidence in Chautauqua by Chautauquans as the public buildings and private cottages accelerate their evolution heading into the 20th century.

1892 Chautauqua Assembly Herald

The Assembly Herald editor Dr. Flood writes:

“The Board has adopted plans and ordered the construction of new Amphitheatre, with largely increased seating capacity, a new choir gallery, and a generous supply of offices and retiring rooms. An able committee has been appointed to superintend the work.

“The Amphitheatre has served its purpose well, but it has outlived its day, and while it will be parted with regretfully its successor will be welcomed most gratefully. The question of sewerage has been disposed of in much the same way.”

1Chq fees

“The first business of importance brought up at the meeting of the Chautauqua Board of Trustees yesterday was the rebuilding of the Amphitheatre. It was decided to make a full Amphitheatre which will accommodate 1000 more people than the present one; to have a large circular chorus gallery, and to use the rooms back of the organ as offices and retiring rooms.”

2

albion

Later that Summer they wrote of the abandonment of the Auditorium in Miller Park for the 1879 Amphitheatre, and that being replaced by the planned 1893 Amphitheatre and of Chautauqua’s ongoing evolution from tents to well appointed cottages and public structures:

The Great Improvement in Cottages.

“In the early days there were few cottages of any sort at Chautauqua. Tents were the rule, both for meetings and lodgings, and the great meetings were held in the old Auditorium, now Miller Park, with nothing overhead but the trees, the clouds and the rest of the universe. Anyone who would have then predicted that within a few years the public buildings and grounds here would represent an outlay of nearly half a million dollars, and the program an annual cost of fifty thousand dollars, would have been called a sanguinary enthusiast. But all this has come to pass and the end is not yet. With the abandonment of the Auditorium for the Amphitheatre, (soon itself to be replaced by a far grander structure) of the sectional tents for the Temple, Normal Hall, and the Hall of Philosophy, and of the old Palace Hotel (of canvas) for the magnificent Athenaeum, there has gone on a gradual evolution from the tent, through the cheap unbattened hemlock board shanty… through battened shanties of boards with fewer large knot holes; through the modest four roomed cottage with siding, and its various successors, each better than the other…Chautauqua has good reason to be proud of the class of buildings both public and private, now being erected.”

great improvement evolutionsummer furniture

The Board meeting held in Pittsburg (before the h was added) in mid January 1893 was described as one of the most important ever held. In hindsight, this would prove to be a huge understatement when combined with the decisions already made in the Summer of 1892, and in light of upcoming events in early 1893. At the time their biggest worry was the possible competition from the World’s Fair in Chicago adversely affecting attendance at the upcoming summers Assembly.

“The welcome announcement was made that the debt of Chautauqua had all been paid. The Board, however, had anticipated this happy condition and had already at former meetings authorized improvements of greater importance and cost which had been waiting for the time when the indebtedness incurred for those already made should have been paid. The completion of some of these improvements, and the certainty that all would be completed for the opening of the present season, was there announced.”

Within weeks of this Board meeting the United States began tipping into the Panic of 1893, one of the worst recessions this country has ever seen. Stock prices declined, unemployment spiked, and there was a run on gold as banks and businesses failed. Construction loans and other forms of lending ground to a halt. Chautauqua, fortuitously was already well underway with an unprecedented amount of both, public and private construction projects.

As the following articles show us, it absolutely was, in many ways the best of times for Chautauqua. Meanwhile, just outside the gates it was the worst of times for the rest of the country as the Panic of 1893 was wrecking havoc on the nations economy.

1893 Chautauqua Assembly Herald – Issue #1 – July 22, 1893

Chautauqua builds a brand new Amphitheatre for the 1893 Assembly. They also installed a brand new Sewerage system which got much more coverage than the Amp in the advance issue that came out in June and the first edition in July. But what gets the most coverage in each and every edition of the Assembly Herald is the Program. The speakers lectures are “reported stenographically” in every issue. The new Amp almost seems to be an afterthought as all the attention is focused on what happens on the platform, in the hall in the grove, and in the classes. The ongoing evolution of Chautauqua’s buildings and cottages is remarkable. It’s refereed to as The New Chautauqua!

AmpArtist Rendering of the New Amphitheater

MATERIAL IMPROVEMENTS

“The new Amphitheater, a drawing of which is shown above, is a magnificent structure of steel and wood, combining all the advantages of the old building with vast improvements in capacity, comfort, and finish. The absence of supporting columns in the center of the auditorium, the easy seats, the clerestory windows above the platform, the semicircular chorus gallery with its cloak rooms, the brilliant electric lighting throughout the building, are the chief points to be mentioned in passing.”

material improvements advanc

athenauem 93' ad

The New Chautauqua

“Since a year ago Chautauqua has so completely changed, that it is not inappropriate to christen it the “New Chautauqua” The improvements made since the close of the Assembly of 1892…are of a most remarkable character. They have been planned with a far-sighted ability and the plans carried out with discretion, wisdom and liberality. They touch Chautauqua life at every point. They have to do with the health, the comfort and the pleasure of all who come here, whether to amuse and instruct others, or to be amused, entertained, or instructed by others. The outside world marvels at the courage of the governing body – The Board of Trustees – who, with a World’s Fair staring them in the face, yet ordered for this season over one-hundred thousand dollars of improvements”

5

sensible womenremington

At the beginning of the 1893 Assembly, after all the work which I detail below was completed, it is reported that the courage shown by the Board of Trustees was marveled at by the outside world. Today some might call them…”Rock Stars,” because they absolutely crushed it. Hitting it on the screws, and out of the park.  So then, why, in the face of Chautauqua’s equally ambitious and successful efforts to carefully plan and raise money for a New Amp are the Administration and the Board of Trustees being miscast by an overly vocal minority, as a misguided, isolated monarchy and royal court? Yes, they started the process thinking Rehab, but it became painfully obvious that was not the best path to follow, so they continued to move forward, not back, and arrived at the only practical conclusion, given the existing conditions and circumstances. The due diligence, after a reality check, was completed appropriately, and once again, rebuilding the Amp is the best solution.

Dr. Flood leads off his description of the “New Chautauqua” improvements with commentary on the New Amp and seven miles of sewerage system. He also describes the contribution of Dr. Duncan, the able Secretary and Superintendent who oversaw all the work.

“The new Amphitheatre is a noble structure indeed, commodious, acoustically fine, beautiful, comfortable alike for audience, speakers, singers or entertainers-everyone’s needs being carefully provided for…The sewerage system…seven miles in length…is the first complete system of the kind ever built on the American Continent.”

6 b

chq steamboatwny & prr

Editors Note: Have a look at the timetables for the Steamboats and Trains. Kind of puts the C.A.R.T.S. Chautauqua schedule in a not so flattering light.

From the July 22, 1893 first edition of the Assembly Herald Dr. Flood writes :

THE NEW CHAUTAUQUA

Improvements on Every Hand Give Evidence of a Prosperous Future. The Summer City Transformed and a New Era Dawns

“Any person who has ever seen Chautauqua before need not be told she has improved. The improvements may be seen on every hand and speak for themselves. Of course we expected improvements, for they come every year, but they are so many and great this year as to amaze one. It may be safely said that Chautauqua with her new walks, sewerage system, improved electric lighting plant, magnificent public buildings, and a host of minor advantages is better equipped than any city of her size…We are now a greater Chautauqua than the world has ever seen.”

And for those of you concerned about the timetable for the completion of the New Amp, this comparison is for you.

“Two learned professors of the Chautauqua College were talking over Chautauqua’s advance in equipment since a year ago and one of them said it was almost a miracle how so much could be done in one short year. Every Chautauquan has had the same thoughts, but it has been the hard work by brain and hand that has wrought the change. During the entire winter no matter how the storm beat and the rain blew, a large force of men was engaged in making Chautauqua more beautiful, more convenient, and more safe than ever before. No one who was not here to see the work progress can form the slightest idea of the mountain of work that was done.”

7

Here’s a complete reckoning of the major projects that were finished between the 1892 & 1893 Chautauqua Assembly’s, that totaled over $100,000 in public improvements to the grounds.

1 – Demolition of the Original Amp and Benches and removing all the debris.

2 – Rebuilding a New Bigger & Better Amp and all new Benches.

3 – Excavation and installation of  seven (7) miles of Sewer lines at a depth of 16′ below grade. The scope of work also included 140 manhole covers, new water main lines, and fire hydrants.

4 – A new Disposal Works Building was erected below the ball-field, where the sewerage system terminated, completing the system.

5 – Three (3) miles of brand new cement Sidewalks were installed by contractors brought in from Ohio.

5 – A new and larger Reservoir was excavated and built to better serve the growing Assembly.

6 – New Street Lighting was installed.

Imagine that! Just for a moment take yourself back to that off season and try to visualize what it was like with the Amp being knocked down and a larger improved model being built in its place. Every street and sidewalk being torn up and seven (7) miles of 16′ deep trenches dug down the center as they laid new sewer pipe, placed water mains, 140 man holes and fire hydrants throughout the grounds, terminating in a new sewage plant being built at the same time. When the sewer was completed they framed and poured out three (3) miles of new cement sidewalks. Chautauqua had never seen anything like it, nor will she ever again.

In addition, 43 new cottages were built as the public and private investments in Chautauqua reached a critical mass and tipping point. This incredible off season of work launches Chautauqua towards the 20th Century with unstoppable momentum.

So at the considered risk of once again being labeled reckless and superficial, I submit the following for your review. I still absolutely maintain, that if Chautauqua can complete all those improvements in one off season with the construction tools, methods and technologies available to them in 1892, then for goodness sake, they can certainly knock down that little old Amp and rebuild a bigger, better version in one off season. It is, as the founding fathers demonstrated, as simple as marshaling the required human and mechanical resources necessary to complete the job. Chautauqua has been there, and done more than that already.


magic lanternM & H pianos chq

 

Editors Note: In addition to the larger scale improvements occurring, the Mason & Hamlin Piano Co. had secured the exclusive Piano rights in Chautauqua and had built the sixth and seventh practice shacks between 1892 & 93′ as part of a long term contract to provide two shacks per year. And now you know the rest of that story.

“Scarcely second to the sewerage system is the New Amphitheatre. When the old Amphitheatre was built it was considered a tremendous work, but the new structure is a greater improvement on the old than the old Amphitheatre was on the old Auditorium in Miller Park.”

“The lower floor opening on the ravine has a large reception and waiting room for the Assembly’s guests. On the right of this room are the offices of the Department of Instruction and a retiring room for speakers. On the left of the reception hall are retiring rooms for solo singers. All the offices and rooms are connected by electric bells and speaking tubes. Just to the left of the organ is a large room devoted to the chorus.”

9ferris corsettsroyal powder

“Deserving of special mention are the broad, well lighted passage ways which connect the stage, besides the broad stage itself. The electric lights encircling the rim of the entire roof and arching the platform, the colored lights back of the choir gallery and the many arc lights render it doubly attractive at night…Numerous other features of this unique structure might be mentioned, but no description can adequately picture it to the mind. It is indeed a remarkable structure. As there are no microbes in our water so there are no diptera in our Amphitheatre.”

10Editors Note: I hope you noticed above that the first podium on the new 1893 platform was an olive wood desk imported from Jerusalem.

Who knew – Hires’ Root Beer is advertised as a Temperance Drink. Cleverly, Hires’ Mad Men changed the copy to expertly target the Chautauqua Assembly demographic. “This great home-made temperance drink is as healthful as it is pleasant. It keeps the children cool and happy. Lightens the cares of the parents and gives new life to the old folks. It’s a real home comfort.”

hires

“The cost of the Amphitheatre was a trifle under$25,000 (actually it came in over $26K as the new electric lighting ran over budget). It was a great work to finish this building in time for the opening exercises, but by working day and night it was done. A week before the season opened almost everyone said it could not be ready, but Chautauqua never yet failed to do what she promised and it had to be completed.”

11

beechamsTrib

From the August 2, 1893 Chautauqua Assembly Herald covering the Opening Ceremonies Editor Dr. Flood writes:

“Opening Day at Chautauqua is ever a glad day. It bears in its open palm the bright prophecy of coming days. it comes with glad greetings. It revives old friendships. It awakens old happy memories. Its bells thrill the pulses of these groves with a new life. It is the launching of another ship in a growing navy. It is not a carnival but a re-dedication. It is the uncovering of the coals of the Chautauqua spirit, it is a rekindling of slumbering enthusiasm, a relighting of refilled torches.”

The Assembly Herald printed the speeches word for word as President Miller went on to officially open the Assembly followed by Dr. Hurlbut who harkened back to the First Assembly:

“I have been looking back tonight and trying to put myself in the condition of those people who did come to the first Assembly. in those day there was a tabernacle of slabs on top of the hill, and we sat on benches made of slabs and ate off a table of slabs, slabs of things that we never knew what they were, and we were glad to get them. And we did not sit in an Amphitheatre like this. I remember one occasion it began to rain. People did not get up and leave when it began to rain in those days, they simply raised their umbrellas. Chautauqua has gone on. It has sent its influence wherever the waves of the ocean roll.”

15

16

Dr. W.R. Harper followed Dr. Hurlbut to the Podium on the Platform and his words proved timeless and so very appropriate today, in light of the burgeoning controversy surrounding the proposed plans for building another New Amphitheater. Don’t you just love it when someone else says it better than you ever could have.

“Ladies and Gentleman: – At this time it becomes us to look back and at the same time to look forward. Has the time come for Chautauqua to stand still? No. The lesson of the past is clear. Chautauqua must do in the future what she has done in the past…My faith in Chautauqua is dependent upon doing one thing. The cultivation of these friends and lovers of Chautauqua …of criticism. Not higher criticism but Chautauqua criticism… Criticism is the use of opportunities with that which is to be criticised in such a way that its great purpose and the means it has developed to carry out that purpose shall be known to those who are friendly toward it…Not the criticism that will pick out this flaw and that flaw, but criticism that will point out the grandeur of the work and point out its possibilities… what can be done, what ought to be done. And so will not the friends of Chautauqua familiarize themselves more closely than ever with what Chautauqua plans today. Will you not be ready for the announcement of new plans in the future? For if Chautauqua is to do for the future what she has done for the past, it must present new plans. And when they are announced will you not study them, will you not lay them upon your heart and soul, will you not help Chautauqua do for others what she has done for you.”

(Applause)

17

I support the need for a New Amp. The old one just isn’t worth preserving or rehabilitating. The declining structural integrity of the existing canopy and functional obsolescence of the backstage areas precludes those efforts. There is no time to waste trying to save the old one. That filibuster must end so a consensus building summer can begin that focuses on the plans for the New Amp that we will leave behind for future generation of Chautauquans.
 Slide10
Transverse Section Through The New Bowl
 
 That being said I am not operating with blind allegiance or a deaf ear to every detail of the current plans. It’s clearly too late for a full scale planning charrette, but it is incumbent on all of us to engage in that “transparent discourse” that everyone says they want. The largest obstacle that must be overcome is that there are way too many stakeholders with widely varying concerns and corresponding ideas on how to get there. Instead of diverging critical dialogue hogging the spotlight and wasting our time being reactive, we all should be proactively converging with constructive “Chautauqua” criticism that puts a laser beam focus on the plans for the New Amp.
 Slide11
 Existing Building Section With Proposed Outline (Red)
We need to promote joint ownership of the best possible solution to the New Amp. So many have contributed financially to get us to this point, and the final step is everybody else buying in and pointing out the possibilities, what can and ought to be done to make this New Amp one we all are proud to own and pass on to future generations. As I said, it’s our Amp, so let’s all own it by making positive contributions to Chautauqua’s plans. Dan Ariely (CHQ Week 4), Behavioral Economist and best selling author addresses this in his book The Upside of Irrationality and labels it “The Ikea Effect”. The Swedish based retail chain is best known for selling furniture that requires assembly. Through experiments they found that participants who had to put something together, were upon completion, much more enamored with it. The psychology behind this was prominently noted in the perception shift of housewives baking cakes from scratch as the post World War II economy took off. The original instant cake mixes were marketed as a time saver for busy housewives but just adding water and baking left them feeling under appreciated. Betty Crocker gets the most credit for removing the dried eggs from the recipe so housewives had to add their own eggs. They also added a tin of frosting which needed to be spread to complete the job. It was the proverbial icing on the cake. Sales increased dramatically as the nations homemakers took ownership of the cake they helped create.
 Longitude Section
 Longitudinal Section Through New Bowl
So as an embattled French Queen who was misquoted, never said, “Let them eat cake.” Apparently one of the aforementioned pamphleteers made that one up to further inflame the public. But we are pretty sure someones French Grandma once said “It’s all fun and games until people start losing their heads.”

Chautauqua’s Amphitheater Redux v. 3.0

Amp-Interior-Stage-ViewAmp Symphony & Choir

Proposed New Amp (L), and Current Amp (R)

First by way of introduction I am a 4th Generation Chautauquan and I have been responsible for over $100 Million in Commercial Construction Projects. Among those was a year spent working on a National Historic Landmark Building that qualified for National Historic Tax Credits and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. I consulted on three other development projects that looked into Historic Designation and Tax Credits and one of those was in Chautauqua. So that being said, in my humble opinion I find myself at least somewhat qualified to toss my four cents worth in on this. Not the usual two cents, but four, as I have a lot to share with you.

“If history were taught in the form of stories, it would never be forgotten.” – Rudyard Kipling

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away…board members were evaluating the earning potential of their old arena versus building a new one. They decided it was time to replace the old arena with a modern, more flexible facility that could handle greater crowds, provide more unobstructed views, and usher in a glitzy new look to attract new audiences. The negotiations proceeded quietly, with little hint that the demise of this Landmark was being contemplated. When the plans were finally made public, and people realized they called for the demolition of the Landmark, the reaction was quick and loud. Now alerted, architects, artists, non-profit groups and concerned citizens were outraged at the prospected demise of such a significant and historic structure and almost uniformly called for the Landmark to be preserved.  Proposing instead that a study should be made with a view to preserving those qualities for which the Landmark is justly famous.

A group banded together to support and promote the cause to preserve this Landmark. As hoped, they captured the media spotlight. Its members gave interviews to reporters, and succeeded in portraying themselves as determined and civic-minded. Predictably, editorials condemning the demolition  and appealing for its preservation appeared frequently in the press. Perhaps, more importantly, they drew the attention of thousands, who were finally induced to take a long, hard look at the Landmark slated for demolition.

I trust this all sounds very familiar? Yes indeed it should. The group that banded together to save the Landmark was named The Committee to Save the Historic Amp…no…not just yet. They took the name AGBANY (Action Group for Better Architecture in New York). The Landmark they were trying to save was New York’s Penn Station, and the year was 1962. Like I said, a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. All the text above was taken almost word for word from various publications about AGBANY’s effort to save Penn Station. I changed Madison Square Garden to “arena” and Penn Station to ” Landmark”.

Penn Station was demolished to make way for the 4th Generation Madison Square Garden and the Penn Plaza office complex. AGBANY wrote the original playbook for Historic Preservation and I have no doubt that the save the amp group (hereafter the committee) fancies themselves as walking in their footsteps. Eleanor Roosevelt, Phillip Johnson, et al. they are not, and the Amp is certainly no Penn Station either.

Penn station waiting 62'250px-Penn_Station1

Penn Station Interior

Some have commented that the proposed rebuilding of the Amphitheater is Chautauqua’s Penn Station moment. On the surface and certainly in the press they could seem similar. But if you dig a little deeper the whole metaphor literally collapses. The Amp isn’t Penn Station, metaphorically, structurally, or architecturally. Penn Station met the wrecking ball because the Pennsylvania Railroad was awash in more than a decade of red ink and couldn’t afford to even clean the station, let alone repair and maintain it. It was, plain and simple, a business deal. They optioned the air rights over the terminal in the late 1950’s. The developers of Madison Square Garden and Penn Plaza got the largest build-able site in Manhattan with a built in transit hub and the Pennsylvania Railroad received $2.1 Million/year in rent, a 25% stake in the new Madison Square Garden Corporation, and a “brand new air conditioned” station below ground thus reducing there operating expenses by over $600K annually. An offer, that under the existing circumstances, they simply couldn’t refuse. Penn Station was an architectural masterpiece, designed and built for the ages. But if the terminal building was the soul of the project, its heart was the ambitious, massive infrastructure engineering effort whose tunnels knitted together the entire Eastern Seaboard, that still survives to this day. Please see my Penn Station page for more on its Rise, Fall, and pending Reincarnation and cited sources.

penn demo 2penn eagles

Demolition of Penn Station

Paul Goldberger who recently weighed in on preserving the Amp called Penn Station, “the great martyr of historic preservation, the building that died so that we might save others in the future.” in the PBS Documentary, The Rise and Fall of Penn Station. In 1965 New York City passed their Landmark’s Law and the following year the the National Historic Landmark Act was passed. Within the next few years; the Landmarks Preservation Commission declared Grand Central Terminal an Historic Landmark, and then the financially struggling New York Central Railroad announced plans to knock down Grand Central and build a 55 story skyscraper. The ensuing court battle went all the way to the Supreme Court which ruled in 1978 that the historic designation was not an undue infringement. Penn Station had died so that Grand Central could be saved.

back o houseamp back porch

Back of the New Amp (L), Current Amp (R)

Now lets jump off the Penn Station tracks landing directly on Chautauqua’s third rail, the proposed rebuilding of the Amp. I have some questions for the committee. What exactly is it that you are trying to preserve? Have you really thought this all the way through to its most logical conclusion? The Amphitheater by its original function is a third generation tent. Oh my God, did I just say that out loud…uh yeah…yes I did. Somebody needed to. Paul Goldberger already brought it up in a recent PreservationNation Blog post, but in much grander terms than I’m about to use. And yes I know, it’s “Our Amp”, the Amp we all grew up in. And our parents and grandparents before us. I won’t bore you with my Hallmark Amp moments, but seriously, its just a glorified tent. It has a better; canopy, tent poles and ground cloth than its predecessors, but she has long since outlived her day and is straining at her seams. A life span greatly extended by some tender loving care, numerous operations, and yes, even an organ transplant.

 

1907-BackAmp-Construct21907-BackAmp-Construct

Installation of the Massey Organ 1907 

Many of us have been following, with varying degrees of curiosity, disbelief, and disappointment, the percolating campaign to save the Amp. So which pieces and parts are you trying to save? The 3rd roof, the 5th stage, the 4th backstage, and all the benches that have already been replicated? Maybe its the unsightly appendage that is the bleachers. This beloved old building, has been elevated to masterpiece status and national significance by a campaign to save its insignificant architecture, nay historic fabric, that includes a generic bead-board ceiling, bridge style trusses, a deteriorated roof structure with an unfinished attic and a functionally obsolete back stage area. And its so far out of building and ADA code compliance, I’m surprised they can even insure it.

amp catwalkamp bench replace

Current Amp Attic (L) and Benches Replaced (R)

Those who so vocally oppose the rebuilding of the Amp seem to be operating with tunnel vision and a deaf ear in their resistance to positive change. What is conspicuously missing from the orchestrated hype that has replaced the rational debate, nay discourse, they claim to want is a real desire to understand the dirty laundry list of problems with the existing facility and the proposed plans for the building’s rebirth before going off on “the process” because you vehemently disagree with the obvious conclusion. The proposed solution is ultimately correct, even if you don’t like the way they showed their work. For those fixated on saving the existing roof and bead-board ceiling, that is simply not the best answer. In fact it makes very little sense at all. Do you take your preservation in layers? Perhaps a patchwork time capsule quilt approach, weaving together the old, the really old, and the new. But lets not kid ourselves, that quilt is only as strong as its weakest “historic fabric”. Do you really want your kids, grand kids or grandparents walking around under a couple of tons of audio visual equipment suspended from steel beams that were first riveted and welded over 120 Chautauqua winters ago. The preservationists in their religious zeal keep whining about the “Historic Integrity” of the old girl. I for one, am more worried about her Structural Integrity.

amp airbandamp ada walker

Our Metaphorical Kids, Grandkids, (L) and Grandparents (R)

Oh yeah, about that roof you want to save. Let’s have another look at that while we’re here. Below you will find three pictures from the last roof replacement in 1980. Do you really think those battens, rafters, and joists magically got stronger, straighter, and less cracked since these shots were taken over 30 years, tons of snow, and hundreds of freeze and thaw cycles later? The only color picture below was taken just three winters after the roof was replaced and structural supports were added to the tune of over $700,000. They had to bring a crane in to help support the roof, while they shoveled the snow and ice off of her. There is a time and a place for Historic Preservation/Rehabilitation. This time, this Amp, with these building materials and an almost complete lack of architectural significance, are, like it or not, just not it. Penn Station was designed by the most accomplished architects of their time, and built with materials that were intended to last for ages. This Amp, most certainly was not. Its predecessor lasted just 14 years and Chautauqua President Lewis Miller could hardly wait to knock that one down and start over in 1892.

roof facia 79-80amp 1980 new steel roof prep

amp facia shimssnow overload w.crane

Some of those writing the heartfelt pieces that have recently appeared in the regional press seem to have abandoned the idea of a balanced point of view that the first couple articles tried to present. So as you have already seen I’m going to rebut on the other side of this Amp debate. I would think that as Chautauquans we all share a similar set of values and corresponding rules of engagement.  Unfortunately this self aggrandizing campaign to save the Amp quickly escalated into a win-at-any-cost-and-by-any-means vendetta in the name of “historic preservation.” Thankfully some of that negative energy has been channeled elsewhere, presumably scrap-booking. A few of you are acting as though this decision was made in the back room of dimly lit bar, over a few too many drinks, and the plans were drawn up on the back of a napkin. A lot of thought, time, energy and resources have been put into this by and for people who have a lot more invested in Chautauqua than most of us. The Board of Trustees, the Administration, the Foundation, the Amp Committee, and all those who have thus far worked on this incredibly ambitious New Amp project have done their due diligence and have come to the only conclusion that makes any sense given the existing conditions and circumstances. And yes the timing of the reveal of the big “D” (ssshhh D-E-M-O) word was surely procrastinated, but who among us really wanted to deliver that news. They shoot messengers don’t they!  There is enough irresponsibility and ambiguity to go around. It’s out there now, and as they say, it is what it is.

Amp-Interior-West-Viewchoir loft out center

Interior View New Amp (L), Current Amp (R)

The most basic and determining question is not being asked at all. What will be lost, and what will be gained? The proposed New Amp that is being rejected out of hand by the committee, is a very good solution, that will completely replace a facility of debatable architectural, structural, and functional merit with a wonderful new building that will meet the needs of generations of Chautauquans for years to come. Any and all virtues it may possess seem to be irrelevant for those who oppose it, since the facts would only spoil a good fight. This is not a zero-sum game. We do not lose the Amphitheater. It’s not going underground like Penn Station. Everything that is good about it will be retained in the New Amphitheater. We keep; its size, its scale, and its intimate and open relationship to its surroundings. Aesthetically it will look and feel very much the same, inside and out, while functionally it will be far superior. The decision was made to change very little about its iconic form and presence except for the back stage areas. And none can argue that there is where the much needed and most important changes will take place. Especially for those who work behind the scenes and above the stage putting the programs together. All things considered, it is painfully obvious that this is a “win win” situation for Chautauqua.

And by the way, how many of you have even noticed that the New Amp’s back patio and upper level porch look a lot more like the original 1893 version and the 1908 (post Massey Organ) version (below R), than the current appended model. Please click to see my 3rd Generation vs 2nd Generation comparison page for more information and pictures.

back o houseamp back patio & porch post massey 1908

Back of the New Amp (L), 1908 Amp (R)

It all started in 1874 in the Auditorium, a rudimentary platform in Miller Park surrounded by benches. Rainy day activities were held in the Tabernacle on the Hill, a tent that was located in what is now Bestor Plaza. A couple of summers later it was on to the Pavilion, a platform under a canvas covering spread across the ravine where the Amp sits today, followed by the first Amp built in 1879 and its successor finished in 1893, and remodeled numerous times since. The Assembly gathered on a daily basis to hear the speakers, preachers, and entertainers from morning into the evening. The sum total of the entire program offered to the Assembly was referred to as the “Platform”. Today we call it the Program. Please see my Amp History page for a more detailed description, timeline and pictures.

Miller Park Platform 3Miller Park Platform 2

Platform and Benches (L) and Assembly on Benches (R) in Miller Park

Make no mistake about this. The beating heart of Chautauqua, was then, is now, and always will be, the Program. The Amp is not the destination as has been suggested by one of the committee members. Chautauqua is the destination because of the Program put on each and every summer and the Amp is the iconic venue for many of the events. But the facilities that support the program, the heart of Chautauqua, are spread throughout the grounds. Since the very beginning the facilities have evolved over time. Changing in form to adapt to the function and the programmatic elements required as the program(s) evolved and the Assembly grew. Without the Program there would be no Amp, and Chautauqua, if it even existed, would just be another summer community situated on a really nice lake.

Don’t let those who so vocally oppose the New Amphitheater derail/delay this incredible, much needed, and already funded building project. We should all be celebrating this, not allowing an overly zealous minority to vilify it. Just as the 1893 Amp was a vast improvement on the 1879 version, this New Amp is another quantum leap forward for Chautauqua. The preservationists keep harping about the historic integrity of the Amp. Chautauqua does not vacate its history by rebuilding the Amp. It honors it by preserving and more prominently displaying the Massey Organ, and adaptively reusing the Memorial Bricks and Plaques and removing the bleachers. The New Amp will function much better in supporting the Program and ensures an even brighter future. It’s all about what happened; on a platform in Miller Park, in a tent on a hill, under a canvas stretched across a ravine, and in the two subsequent wooden structures. All of the people that graced those platforms and the generations of Chautauquans who attended the events, that happened in those times, and in those spaces, are what matters. Chautauqua does not interrupt and/or lose its history by changing the physical structure where it occurs. Did the New York Yankees lose their 26 World Series Championships and all those Hall of Fame players when they moved out of The House that Ruth Built and into a brand new Yankee Stadium, knocking the old one down? No they didn’t, and as Hall of Fame Yankee Manager Casey Stengel was fond of saying “You could look it up”.

amp 1amp curved stage

1879 Amp (L), and 1893 Amp (R)

Even longer ago, but a lot closer to home…Chautauqua finds itself in a similar situation today, as between the 1891 & 1892 Seasons. The Amphitheatre (old school spelling), despite just being 14 seasons old is already showing signs of age and its clear that it can’t keep pace with the growth of Rogers Band, other performances, and the growing Assembly in general. The flat roof is leaking and causes a deafening noise during rain storms and there is ongoing concern about the winter snow loads. The numerous columns cause many seats to have obstructed views while the oil lamps are a fire hazard. Shortly after the opening of the Assembly in August 1892 and with Chautauqua on firm financial footing, the Board of Trustees voted to build a new Amphitheatre. This was reported by Chautauqua Assembly Daily Herald Editor Dr. Flood in his front page editorial August 2nd 1892.

“The report of the meeting of the Chautauqua Assembly Board of Trustees… contains some of the most gratifying news it has been our pleasure to record. The Board has adopted plans and ordered the construction of a new Amphitheatre, with largely increased seating capacity, a new choir gallery, and a generous supply of offices and retiring rooms. An able committee has been appointed to superintend the work… The Amphitheatre has served its purpose well, but it has outlived its day, and while it will be parted with regretfully, its successor will be welcomed most gratefully.”

And as they say, the rest is history…

“It is the soothing thing about history, that it does repeat itself.” – Gertrude Stein

 

Notes and Cited Sources:

All the Pictures above are from the Chautauqua Institution Archives and Amp project websites.

Click here to go to my Penn Station page for the rest of the story on its Rise, Fall & Pending Reincarnation and cited sources.

The Amp History and 3rd Generation vs 2nd Generation Comparison pages are linked here.

A few of the phrases and words above are respectfully borrowed and adaptively reused from Ada Lousie Huxtable’s Wall Street Journal article The Best Way to Preserve 2 Columbus Circle? A Makeover. See my 2 Columbus Circle – Preservation vs. Makeover page for a brief history and a copy of her article.