Chautauqua Amphitheater Comparison – 3rd vs 2nd Generation

Slide10Slide11

The current Amp structure has many challenges because of age, size, configuration, dated infrastructure, and the demands of presenting a 21st century program in a 19th century building. The functional goals for the New Amp are to increase capacity and functionality, improve safety, inter-generational accessibility and sight lines, and bring the back of the house up to 21st-century standards. It was decided to keep the New Amp in its current location, while looking at a large excavation project to deliver these objectives. Specifically, the bowl will be approximately 7 feet lower in most areas and 15 feet lower in the orchestra pit; its perimeter will expand approximately 15 feet wider on each side. The New Amp replaces a facility of debatable architectural, structural, and functional merit with a wonderful building that will meet the future needs of generations of Chautauquans for years to come. We do not lose the Amphitheater. Everything that is good about it will be retained in the New Amphitheater. We keep; its size, its scale, and its intimate and open relationship to its surroundings. Aesthetically it will look and feel very much the same, inside and out, and functionally it will be superior.  The decision was made to change very little about its iconic form and presence except for the back stage areas.

Back of the Amp

back o houseamp back porch

Here is where the vast majority of physical changes to size, scale and function(s) take place. The current functionally obsolete space measures 6,246 square feet. The new back of the Amp (in 1893 it was called the front) will increase to approximately 21,000 square feet that allows for numerous and much needed improvements. Primary among these are; better dressing rooms, green room, storage areas, increased locker and office space, warm-up and staging areas for the performers, and a new loading dock and freight elevator. The concerns about losing the back porch should be alleviated as the back porch will only be changing into a back patio that will provide even better access to the speakers, guests and performers following presentations and programs. The design will create a very open, comfortable environment similar to the current Amp and we gain an upper level porch and more natural light in the process. Oh and by the way, did anyone even notice that the back of the new Amp looks more like the original version with a patio and an upper level porch, than the current version. Yeah I thought so. Let’s have another look below. The New Amp (L) and the 1908 Amp (R) after the Massey Organ was installed. There is however, no truth to the rumor spreading on the grapevine that one of the “Star” dressing rooms will be named the Justin Bieber Room.

back o houseamp back patio & porch post massey 1908

 

 

Interior View

Amp-Interior-West-Viewchoir loft out center

The Stage (Platform) will increase in size in both directions and a new orchestra pit large enough for 100 musicians will be added. The pit will feature a lift that can increase the stage size to better serve dance and other large productions or where additional benches can be placed when not in use. This will significantly improve sight-lines for those seated in the lower levels. The obvious choice was made to preserve the key structural elements of the Massey Memorial Organ and its surroundings, while making the organ more visible to audiences in the new Amp.

View to the Stage (Platform) and Massey Organ

Amp-Interior-Stage-ViewAmp Symphony & Choir

There are approximately 4,063 seats in the Amp. The new Amp will have between 4,400 and 4,500 seats and will include 100 handicap-accessible seats, an equal number of companion seats, and more comfortable benches for all. The design also improves sight lines, acoustics, and overall safety for audience members as its brought up to current building codes. Many believe the Amp’s signature curved ceiling contributes to its excellent acoustics, and this feature is retained in the new structure.

The new handicapped accessible seats and their companion seats will be located in three rows — one in the front row of the main floor; one at the middle of the main floor; and one around the top row. The existing ramps greatly exceed current ADA requirements in pitch and are being replaced with new steps that are easier and much safer to navigate with appropriate handrails and lighting. The seating will look very much like it does now with wooden benches that will be re-designed to provide a more comfortable ergonomic profile.

The bleacher seats are being replaced with an increase in regular bench seats, allowing the west side of the Amp to be open, as it was in the past. Eliminating these bleachers will improve the opportunities for natural breezes to flow through the Amp and will further enhance those intimate qualities of openness and connectivity along the perimeter thereby increasing standing room and porch viewing.

The existing interior columns today are currently approximately 20’ apart. The new Amp nearly doubles that span to approximately 38’, thereby increasing the number of seats with an unobstructed view to the stage. The reduction in columns will be offset by an increase in structural members above the ceiling space and stronger columns with higher-strength steel. The new roof structure will extend outward to cover all seats and the last row of handicapped-accessible seats.

amp handicap bench rainamp ada walker

 

Building Systems (Mechanical, Electrical, H.V.A.C. & Telecom)

From the new loading dock and freight elevator, through the mechanical and electrical systems, out to the sound booth and up to the lighting and audio visual controls, the New Amp will be up to code, industry standards, and a much safer and more efficient place for those who work setting up before the varied programs and behind the scenes. From electric bells and speaking tubes in 1893, to fiber optics, an adjustable pit, and a real loading dock and freight elevator.

amp scaffold & speakersamp lighting ladder

amp catwalkamp lighting controls

9 thoughts on “Chautauqua Amphitheater Comparison – 3rd vs 2nd Generation

  1. Pingback: Chautauqua’s Amphitheater Redux v. 3.0 | Drift of the Day

  2. One need not demolish the historic building and construct a replica to make it more comfortable and accessible. Options should be explored. The architect was following the program wishes of Becker . Where is the justification and support materials for their claims. The historical structures report? Why they feel the need for binding agreements for confidentiality?What is the programming vision and where is it hidden? In others where is the beef? Which artists don’t come for any reason related to the Amp? Why would anyone trust the CI to do the right thing when they have demonstrated such insincerity and lack of transparency? The letter to donors spelled that out clearly last November. When they told thousands it was sensitive rehab
    and the community was told they should have figured out on their own it was not?
    Why does Chautauqua need an outside PR firm to help talk to the community?

    Like

    • Your Pingback is very difficult to read and understand. One reason is because you don’t use proper punctuation. At the end of a sentence, there is no space between the last word and the period. When you use a question mark, the sentence must be complete and in the form of a question. There should always be at least one space, (in my time there were two) between the end of a sentence and the beginning of a sentence, regardless if that sentence ends with a period, question mark or exclamation mark. Many of your sentences are not well constructed.. Obviously you must be bright, so I will assume this is all because you are angry, frustrated or perhaps just in a hurry. It’s a “flurry” of typing.

      I’m not involved in your “SavetheAmp” or the property owners rantings; however, I see a young man lost. You don’t understand how the institution works. You work for a public firm (I believe its public), so I don’t expect you to understand that this is a private company. It is not a democracy.

      1. Brian Said: One need not demolish the historic building and construct a replica to make it more comfortable and accessible.
      That’s not why they are taking on this project
      2. Brian Said: The architect was following the program wishes of Becker
      Whose wishes should they have followed? Do you know there is an entire team of extremely well respected people working on this project? So, no, Tom Becker is not the only Wish Maker
      3. Brian Said: Where is the justification and support materials for their claims.
      Please be more clear about what claims you speak of.
      4. Brian Said: The historical structures report? That is not a sentence, and I do not know what you speak of.
      5. Brian Said: Why they feel the need for binding agreements for confidentiality?
      You’re a businessman.(See below}. These are common in every business. I put bids on projects when I was working, and it was so others wouldn’t steal my work and take it for their own. .It think you meant to type, “Why do they feel …….”
      6. Brian Said: What is the programming vision and where is it hidden?
      The programming vision has always been the same and it is not hidden. Have you not received your Chautauqua calendar? If you call the main number, they’ll get you on the mailing list.
      7. Brian Said: In others where is the beef? Do you mean “In other words, where’s the beef?”
      There is huge been. Read the report. I don’t believe I should need to point this out to you!!
      8. Brian Said: Which artists don’t come for any reason related to the Amp? Do you mean “Which artists will not come back due to reasons related to the amp?” I don’t know which artists, but if you took one look back stage, you’d know why. It’s also unfair to our orchestras, and other performers. We should just keep everything moldy, outdated and unconnected with the wold of performance.
      9. Brian Said: Why would anyone trust the CI to do the right thing when they have demonstrated such insincerity and lack of transparency?
      Brian my boy. Perhaps you are not paying attention to the words said at meetings, the website, the letters, the newsletters and the newspapers. You also may not live in a town where they travel off season to let everyone know the aspirations of the Institution. They are quite clear, and people are quite pleased. If things are not transparent, how do you know they exist?
      10 Brian: The letter to donors spelled that out clearly last November.
      The letter to the donors? What letter to the donors? What did that letter sell out? Are you a donor? There are different levels of donors, and those who gave to this project are not in your league, and they are very happy with the project and the direction the board, the foundation and President Becker has led us.
      11. Brian Said: When they told thousands it was sensitive rehab
      and the community was told they should have figured out on their own it was not?
      This sentence makes not sense at all. I can only figure that you mean to say. First the institution said this was a sensitive rehab. Then when they found it could not be done that way due to structural problems, they told these thousands “you should have figured this out of their own”. It still makes no sense, but I tried to understand you.
      12. Brian Said: Why does Chautauqua need an outside PR firm to help talk to the community?
      This is an easy one. During the off-season, the entire institution works on getting ready for the next season. You don’t have clue as to how much is involved. You have created this monster, and in order to make you happy, (yes, you), they had to hire a PR firm to help them answer the nonsense questions that come from all directions. Jane Gross and Hale Oliver are huge instigators, which seemed to allow you to go back to work for several months. They must have let you back out of your cage.

      I believe you have a job. I looked you up on the internet. No hard to find:

      Brian Berg’s position:
      Developing and implementing marketing, media relations, advertising and brand identity campaigns to promote and build awareness of products and services to help build a new and sustainable financial institution. Led the crisis communications effort to save the former bank (ShoreBank) and stave off political opposition during the ongoing regulatory period, from 2007 to 2010, which culminated in catalyzing more than $150 million in new capital from investors and the development of the new Urban Partnership Bank.

      Boy, looks like they have you in a training program here. No wonder you need ‘thousands” to help.

      Like

      • Mixed feelings about a total tear-down but can accept it. The board falling down during the season and causing injury may have been an omen of sorts.
        Big concern: Older people have voiced this to me a number of times: Ramps, as much as they are steep, can be less dangerous than steps. Steps with a long step and a short riser can be confusing. Older people often have compromised vision, hence they “shuffle” as they make their way down a ramp. Not noticing the next step will cause some to not prepare for a step-down. Comments welcome. Bob,
        Chautauquan for 33 years.

        Like

      • Bob,
        As you can imagine I’ve gotten hundreds of emails and comments and a few have echoed your thoughts on the steps. Maybe in this case the steps are “the lesser of evils”. They will be lit and have railings in the center of the aisle. I do not know of the length of the step or height of the riser. And yes the pillar failing in March and the ceiling falling spoke loudly.

        Like

Leave a comment